Winners!

October 14th, 2009

Exciting news! The Quantum Tamers has won “The Audacity Prize” from the International Science Film Festival!

Check out the the full list of winners and prizes here.

“The Quantum Tamers” broadcast documentary brings together over a dozen of the planet’s brightest minds to show how the weird is becoming wired and why a new era of quantum technologies is going to rock your world.

Its Canadian premiere takes place on Saturday, October 17 at 9pm at the Princess Twin (cinema). For full listings, to to http://q2cfestival.com/film_festival.

Cory Doctorow

October 14th, 2009

Thanks to Cory Doctorow for mentioning the festival on Boing Boing.  We’re very excited to have Cory join us on Thursday, October 22. At 4pm he will be giving a lecture titled: Copyright versus universsal access to all human knowledge and groups without cost: The state of play in the global copyfight.  Later that day he will be participating in the the Agenda with Steve Paikin on Robotics Revolution and the Future of Evolution. Looking forward to both of them!

Sean Carroll

October 14th, 2009

Thanks to Sean Carroll for mentioning us on his blog, Cosmic Variance.  We are excited to have Sean join us for the festival. Sean will be participating in a panel tomorrow - Thursday, October 15, titled The 10 Biggest Questions in Physics.  He will also be giving a lecture on The Origin of the Universe and the Arrow of Time on Saturday, October 17.  Remember that if you are not in the Waterloo area, or were not able to get tickets, you can watch events online, live and on-demand.  Check back at q2cfestiva.com for details, or watch our facebook page for updates.

“Speaker call includes make-up”

October 14th, 2009

Thanks to Chad Orzel for mentioning us in a recent blog post, “Where I’m Going To Be”. Chad, not unlike many of our speakers, will likely be wearing make-up for the first time at this festival, because - as Chad humoursly points out - our speaker call “includes make-up.”  He’s not the first one to get a laugh out of this. I guess most male scientists don’t spend a lot of time powdering their noses.  But although our speakers may be envisioning themselves clad in high fashion, goth or clown make-up (which certainly would put an interesting spin on the events) make-up is really a simple requirement for those who will be broadcast in high definition television. In fact, I’ve heard that without make-up, it’s easy to look utterly ghastly on HDTV, so our speakers actually run a higher risk of looking goth by avoiding the make-up than wearing it.  Either way, I’m afraid you won’t find any of our speakers clad in make-up that resembles the tastes of Marilyn Manson or Krusty the Clown.

Through the eyes of a PSI student - Gamma Ray Bursts, conclusion

October 13th, 2009

We have some important clues about the nature of gamma ray bursts. We know they are transient, and very short by astrophysical standards. This sounds a lot like another astrophysical phenomenon, a supernova. I didn’t mention this before, but we also know there are two types of gamma ray burtsts named short duration GRBs and long duration GRBs, for obvious reasons. At least for long duration bursts, once the burst itself is finished, we see the usual signs of a supernova. So to wrap up our discussion of gamma ray bursts I am going talk about exploding, dying stars that give rise to supernovae and long GRBs.

Stars are layered, with heavier elements accumulating in the middle, like the layers of oil and water in salad dressing. In salad dressing oil and water separate into layers because gravity is pulling on them. In the same way, gravity pulls on all parts of the star, except that there is so much stuff in the star that the gravity is overwhelming. Being put under such extreme pressure causes lighter elements to fuse into heavier elements. In keeping with our salad dressing analogy, the water is being pulled so hard by gravity that it turns into oil. This fusion process releases energy, and that keeps the star from falling in on itself. This is where stars differ from salad dressing, which can support themselves without requiring energy from fusion. But stars are much bigger than bottles of salad dressing, which means that there is a lot more gravity to push up against if they are not to collapse. Luckily, that same enormous mass allows stars build high pressure and start fusion, which pushes outwards against the gravity. Stars are usually in a state of balance, with fusion providing the energy to push outwards and gravity pushing inwards.

At the ends of their lives, stars have a dense iron core in the middle. The iron comes from light elements like hydrogen fusing into heavier elements such as helium, which then fuses into heavier elements, and so on. The problem with iron is that it is the top of the food chain. The iron in the core doesn’t fuse like the lighter elements in stars, so there is no energy being released, and the core can no longer hold itself up against gravity. At this point, the iron core collapses. It grows smaller and denser until it becomes so dense that nuclear forces take over. I will forget about what exactly that means, and I will only mention here the end result, which is that the iron core of the star becomes a neutron star, or possibly a black hole. Afterwards, material outside of the neutron core is exploded into space at speeds up to 30 kilometers per second, which is about 1000 times as fast as you drive. The nature of this explosion is yet to be fully understood, but it results in the bright light we see when we observe some types of supernovae.

Long duration gamma ray bursts are thought to occur when stars die as well. The neutron star accumulates some of the other stellar material, and then it shoots it out along an axis, via a magnetic field. You can see what I mean by looking at the picture, which also shows how a star collapses, courtesy of Nicolle Rager Fuller/NSF.

gamma_ray_burst3

The origin of short duration gamma ray bursts is still uncertain. They are believed to originate from neutron stars colliding with other neutron stars, or black holes. You can read more about GRBs here and you can also read about the gravitational collapse here, and neutron stars here. Having read about dying stars, you should be well-equipped to read all about those astrophysical phenomena with exciting names, and others.

Astronomy Night at The White House

October 11th, 2009

Thanks to Phil Plait , who posted this Video from the White House star party on his blog, Bad Astronomy. On October 7, as part of the International Year of Astronomy, the White House kicked off “Astronomy Night” with 150+ middle school students, who gazed at the stars through telescopes, courtesy of NASA and other organizations.

It’s great to see the Presdient encouraging young people to cultivate “your sense of wonder, your passion, your persistence, your willingness to dedicate your lives to the pursuit of discovery.”

He asked the crowd, “what will your great discovery be?”  Great question.

Don’t forget to check out the Q2C festival’s “all star” line-up at q2cfestival.com/speakers

How to watch Q2C events online

October 8th, 2009

Although tickets to Lectures, Discussions, and “The Agenda with Steve Paikin” live broadcasts are now sold out, you can still watch these discussions online.

All these events will be streamed online live and on-demand at www.q2cfestival.com - watch our homepage for details.

All lectures, discussions, and “The Agenda with Steve Paikin” sessions will be available online shortly after the live event. To access on-demand videos, look for the ‘Play’ button on the image to the left of the event listing.

Gamma Ray Bursts, part two

October 1st, 2009

By Ross Diener So what do we see when we observe a GRB? We see a bright flash of light in our telescope, lasting anywhere, on average, from approximately 0.3 to 30 seconds. These might seem like modest, earthly time scales, and they are, but that is precisely what makes them interesting. Normal astrophysical processes, like the evolution of a start, can take billions of years. Even the orbit of our Earth around the sun takes one year, which is around 30 million seconds, enough time for one million of the longer gamma ray bursts to occur. So it is a bit of an anomaly for such short astrophysical processes to occur, and it makes physicists scratch their heads.

They are called gamma ray bursts, as opposed to bright flashes of light, to emphasize not just the “burst” part of the event, but also that the light coming from these bursts is energetic light known as gamma rays. Gamma rays are produced in subatomic processes like nuclear fusion and radioactive decay. This is a hint about what gives rise to GRBs. We should combine this hint with a couple others. We also know that GRBs are transient, which means an individual GRB occurs once and then never again, and we also know that they occur everywhere in the sky. These hints should help us determine the origin of GRBs, which is exactly what physics is all about.

Before we talk about the origin of GRBs, you might wonder why they were ever discovered. Why would somebody ever think to point a telescope in the sky and look for transient, very short-lived, but very bright events that could occur anywhere? The story of GRBs’ discovery is an interesting one. In 1963, the UK, USSR and USA untied to sign the Partial Test Ban treaty to restrict nuclear weapons tests. The US then launched the first of the Vela satellites, which were designed to detect any nuclear weapon testing in space by their fellow test ban signatories. The Vela satellites were equipped with gamma ray detectors, because gamma rays are released from subatomic processes during nuclear weapon tests. The Vela satellite didn’t find any nuclear testing, although there was a one incident near the southern coast of Africa. What the satellite did find were GRBs. The discovery apparently remained classified until the 1973 publication of this paper. Since then, astrophysicists have deliberated the origin of these bursts and they have come up with some interesting explanations.

Through the eyes of a PSI Student - Gamma Ray Bursts, part one

September 29th, 2009

By Ross Diener

gamma_ray_burst3

Photo credit: Nicolle Rager Fuller/NSF

It is fun to speculate about universes beyond our own, but there are some pretty interesting phenomena to ponder within our own universe. One thing that is especially nice about these marvels is that we can also observe them, albeit with sophisticated telescopes, and from these observations we refine our physical models. Theorists sometimes like to neglect experimental data, and so it was nice of Eliot Quataert, a theoretical astrophysicist at UC Berkeley, to include some experimental data in a recent colloquium he gave at Perimeter Institute. The subject of the colloquium, and the subject of my next couple of blogs, is gamma ray bursts. Like black holes, supernovae, pulsars, and many other astrophysical phenomena, gamma ray bursts have a very exciting name. Exciting names might be a clever astrophysicist trick to win more government grants, but it works, because when I first heard of gamma ray bursts (GRBs) I was immediately interested, as I hope you will be.

So what are GRBs? When we say ‘gamma ray burst’ we really refer to the actual observation of a burst of gamma rays. As opposed to a black hole, which is physics jargon but describes an actual heavenly body, a gamma ray burst is physics jargon but it describes the observation we make on Earth. There is no astrophysical object called a gamma ray burst; we observe gamma ray bursts. I emphasize this to make the following point. Instead of “What are GRBs?” there are really two questions we should ask: “What do we see when we observe a GRB?” and, “What gives rise to a GRB?” I hope to answer these two questions in my next blog posts, and somewhere in the middle I will add some interesting physics history.

The International Year of Astronomy

September 28th, 2009

Have you had a ‘Galileo Moment’ yet?

This year marks the International Year of Astronomy. One of the goals of IYA2009 in Canada is to “offer all Canadians the possibility of enjoying a ‘Galileo Moment’ sometime during 2009.” In fact, IYA2009 wants 1 million Canadians to have a Galileo Moment this year.  So far, 890,454 Galileo Moments have already been documented.

What is a Galileo Moment? To see what qualifies, head www.astronomy2009.ca to see a list of officially sanctioned activities.   Activities may include::

•    Looking through a telescope/binoculars (sidewalk astronomy, star parties, at a science centre or observatory, etc.)

•    Daytime solar viewing

•    Visiting a planetarium

•    Visiting an IYA event, show or display at a science centre

•    Attending an astronomy talk or lecture

•    Visits by amateur and professional astronomers to schools and youth groups

•    Attending a concert or art exhibit or public display that both entertains and educates around a theme inspired by astronomy

For more information about the International Year of Astronomy and how you can get involved, go to www.astronomie2009.ca.

Perhaps Canadians who live in Southwestern Ontario and the GTA will be particularly inspired to learn more about astronomy, as they watched what was likely a meteor streak through the sky on Saturday evening.

See footage captured from the University of Western Ontario Metero Group.

Have you your Galileo Moment yet?

Please leave a comment and share your experience - and be sure to register  with IYA2009!